Remote Operation from Alameda |
There exists a number of ways to accomplish this. Last year I transformed what began as a "flirtation" with Dual-OP'ing contests (operating NX6T remotely, utilizing the "off time" to run as WQ6X from W7AYT in the same contest) into a legitimate, premeditated, operating strategy.
Depending upon the collection of radiosport events on a given weekend, in past contest years I have occasionally run a "separate-but-dual" operation from Fallbrook; joining the NX6T crew's Multi-Single DX contest operations (on STN-2), while running a state QSO Party, or a "little" RTTY contest from STN-1.
A secret to making this work is to REMEMBER that our amateur bands are more-or-less harmonically-related. I take the attitude that the NX6T operation takes priority over WQ6X's
runs on STN-1. Altho I've never dual-OP'ed from NX6T in the same contest, theoretically, doing-so
is legitimately "cheating, but within the rules". The recent WPX-Ssb & JIDX events are examples of [off-site] dual-operating a single contest event.
AUTEK QF-1A & MFJ-751 |
- ([View]) Holy Land DX Contest
- ([View]) ES-Open (Estonia) 80m/40m
- ([View]) WA-PoC (China)
- ([View]) YU-Dx Contest
- ([View]) CQ MM Contest
- ([View]) MIQP - Michigan QSO Party
- ([View]) ONQP - Ontario QSO Party
Likewise, while spots were seen for "ES" stations, none were actually heard above S-2 in Fallbrook, leaving 5 out of the original 7 radiosport events to fill out WQ6X's contest weekend. Overall, this weekend was QUITE a disappointment; other than the CQMM contest, the WAPoC, YUDX and both QSO parties lacked the kind of participation I would expect in such radiosport events.
Because of other non-Radiosport commitments, it was not possible to begin the CQMM event until 01:25z (Saturday afternoon PDT). However, once I got started, the QSO total took off immediately.
Usually the remote operations from NX6T bring out the intentional QRM'ers in the evening/nighttime on 40 meters. This CQMM contest was similar but different; at 02:00z while running a frequency (14026.26) an annoying
"data cranker" made the scene.
Shifting up frequency worked for a
few minutes until he followed me
again and again. By 03:00z 40-meters was way overdue, offering a legitimate reason to make the switch to 40-meters, without the data cranker.
At 05:00z an I encountered a CQMM station on 7.000.22 with a station purposely tuning up atop the CQ'ing station, making QSOs with the band-edge station, all but impossible. Tuning below the band edge (6997.5) the "CQ MM" call was plainly copyable, technically out-of-band. While an intentional-carrier is an intentional-QRM violation, if the CQ caller had been running on 7002 (or above) I doubt the interfering carrier would have started-up in the first place.
On 40-meters in the evening, RTTY QRM usually occurs during Ssb GiGs (like the recent ARRL Dx Contest). For this weekend the RTTY QRM occurred at 05:00z while calling CQ MM on 7015.15.
Are people THAT bored they have nothing else better to do than play RTTY in the Cw portion of
the band?
W Q 6 X after DARK |
C - 3 1 (Tower #1) & Stepp - IR + Shorty - 40 (Tower #2) |
of NA are worth 3 to 10 points, running BI-Directional is a good strategy.
C Q M M - E n d I n g S t a t s |
Did YOU work the CQMM contest (or one of the other GiGs)?
Is WQ6X in YOUR Log?
No comments:
Post a Comment